Captive Review June Edition

A re-occurring battle for risk and insurance managers can often be justifying the existence of a captive insurance company as an ongoing expense.

Although economic recovery has removed some of the aggressive pressure boards exerted on captives at the height of the 2007/08 financial crisis, the challenge still remains.

The June edition of Captive Review seeks to address this issue by exploring a number of areas the captive can deliver additional value or reduce costs.

CR140_cover

Having searched our archive vault I found subrogation (p19) to be a topic that had not been explored in depth before in the magazine.

Using this surprise as a starting point I began by touching base with specialists in the field on both sides of the Atlantic and, as you may expect, encouraging responses followed and a call to captive arms quickly materialised.

While inherent journalistic scepticism prompted me to reach out to managers, commercial carriers and owners themselves it remained apparent captives could be missing out on a trick.

Smaller captives, perhaps those not utilising a complex international insurance programme, should probably be exploring ‘no win, no fee’ subrogation specialists, while the large multinationals should be asking searching questions of their fronting partners and examining claims policies.

If carried out effectively, subrogation could produce significant claims return to the captive and thus improve underwriting profit.

The second feature (p26) explores the growing “strategic risk management” approach and its ability to draw other business elements into the captive outside of traditional insurance procurement.

More exotic and customised lines of insurance are part of this, but an overall culture of closer examination of the captive is also emerging.

One such line that could fall into this category is foreign exchange risk and Randall Beckie (p29), a well-seasoned tax expert and managing director of Frontrunner Captive Management, assesses the current attack on such underwriting by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

Captive Review was also delighted to meet RIMS board member Gordon Adams at the risk management society’s annual conference in New Orleans.

From page 22 Adams explains how in his role as chief risk officer (CRO) at Tri Marine Management he is assessing the captive options available to him and the considerations involved with establishing the global firm’s first insurance vehicle.

Mullen appointment is a statement of intent – David McManus

Peter Mullen taking the reins of Artex Risk Solutions next year is a “logical move” that will boost the captive manager’s growth plans, according to its current leadership....
MORE

Peter Rasmussen joins USA Risk Group

Independent captive manager USA Risk Group has appointed Peter Rasmussen vice president of business development. Rasmussen was previous assistant vice president of sales at Cunningham Lindsey and spent...
MORE

Avrahami had a “chilling effect” on US captive industry – Steve Kinion

A combination of the Avrahami ruling and the PATH Act led to significant dissolutions and re-structuring of captives last year, according to Steve Kinion, director of Delaware’s captive...
MORE

Middle market’s captive interest picks up in Europe

Captive insurance enquiries coming from Europe’s middle market have increased in the last six months, as more regulatory...
MORE