Captive Review June Edition

A re-occurring battle for risk and insurance managers can often be justifying the existence of a captive insurance company as an ongoing expense.

Although economic recovery has removed some of the aggressive pressure boards exerted on captives at the height of the 2007/08 financial crisis, the challenge still remains.

The June edition of Captive Review seeks to address this issue by exploring a number of areas the captive can deliver additional value or reduce costs.

CR140_cover

Having searched our archive vault I found subrogation (p19) to be a topic that had not been explored in depth before in the magazine.

Using this surprise as a starting point I began by touching base with specialists in the field on both sides of the Atlantic and, as you may expect, encouraging responses followed and a call to captive arms quickly materialised.

While inherent journalistic scepticism prompted me to reach out to managers, commercial carriers and owners themselves it remained apparent captives could be missing out on a trick.

Smaller captives, perhaps those not utilising a complex international insurance programme, should probably be exploring ‘no win, no fee’ subrogation specialists, while the large multinationals should be asking searching questions of their fronting partners and examining claims policies.

If carried out effectively, subrogation could produce significant claims return to the captive and thus improve underwriting profit.

The second feature (p26) explores the growing “strategic risk management” approach and its ability to draw other business elements into the captive outside of traditional insurance procurement.

More exotic and customised lines of insurance are part of this, but an overall culture of closer examination of the captive is also emerging.

One such line that could fall into this category is foreign exchange risk and Randall Beckie (p29), a well-seasoned tax expert and managing director of Frontrunner Captive Management, assesses the current attack on such underwriting by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

Captive Review was also delighted to meet RIMS board member Gordon Adams at the risk management society’s annual conference in New Orleans.

From page 22 Adams explains how in his role as chief risk officer (CRO) at Tri Marine Management he is assessing the captive options available to him and the considerations involved with establishing the global firm’s first insurance vehicle.

Captive premium surpasses $1bn in Tennessee

Tennessee captives wrote more than $1bn in premium in 2017, the first time the state has reached the milestone. Captive Review reported earlier this month Tennessee had licensed...
MORE

Ratings downgrade for Security America RRG

Security America Risk Retention Group, Inc has had its financial strength rating downgraded by A.M. Best from ‘B+’ (Good) to ‘B’ (Fair). The long-term issuer credit rating has...
MORE

Advantage opens Vermont office

Advantage Insurance has opened its first office in Burlington, Vermont as it ramps up its activity in the state. Captive Review reported in November the captive manager had...
MORE

106 captive licences surrendered in Utah

There were 60 new captives formed in Utah during 2017, but Captive Review understands 106 licences were surrendered. The 2017 year-end captive number for Utah is 416, plus...
MORE